One Year Later LA Wildfires

City of Los Angeles Wildfires: One Year Later

A year has passed since devastating fires ravaged Los Angeles, scorching over 57,000 acres, destroying more than 18,000 structures, and claiming at least thirty-one lives. 

Shortly after the flames subsided, I wrote about how the catastrophe was not primarily a “climate emergency,” as LA officials hastily proclaimed and the media faithfully parroted; rather, the catastrophe was a glaring example of municipal and state governance failures

One year on, further investigations reveal that my initial criticisms – and the observations of impartial American journalists – have not only been vindicated but amplified. 

What we saw in real-time – budget cuts crippling the fire department, empty reservoirs leaving hydrants dry, and woke leaders like Mayor Karen Bass prioritizing DEI deflection over fire-fighting action – has morphed into a full-blown scandal of incompetence.

It’s now clear that what happened in LA was a preventable disaster exacerbated by officials who put virtue-signalling and woke ideology above the public interest.

The empty reservoirs and dry hydrants, for instance, which turned a bad situation into a catastrophe, can be laid at the feet of Bass’s “diversity hire” administration and her progressive predecessors. 

As I noted originally, nearby three-million-gallon water tanks were quickly depleted, while the distant 117-million-gallon Santa Ynez Reservoir ran dry, forcing firefighters to rely on tanker trucks instead of dependable hydrants. A year later, it’s clear this was no fluke but the product of chronic neglect: the Santa Ynez Reservoir – holding forty times the capacity of the failed tanks – had been offline for months for what officials described as “minor repairs.”

These repairs were overseen by a woman named Janisse Quiñones, CEO of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Quiñones is a proud leftist who proclaimed, at the time of her 2024 appointment by Mayor Bass, that her role was about “righting the wrongs that we’ve done in the past.” 

It’s unclear exactly how her promise to use “an equity lens and social justice” to manage infrastructure was supposed to work but we know that she supported aggressive renewable energy and local water-sourcing targets, framing them as part of correcting environmentally harmful legacy systems. All the woke buzzwords, but not much about actually managing the water supply!

Quiñones was paid $750,000 per year, a salary proposed by Bass – nearly double what her predecessor had made. No doubt those extra few hundred thousand were for “righting” those historical “wrongs!”

Perhaps the least surprising revelation is that this wasn’t some inevitable climate-fueled inferno, as was widely claimed at the time. It was arson. A federal indictment unsealed in 2025 charged one man with maliciously starting the initial brush fire on New Year’s Eve in Topanga State Park, which got out of control, was beaten back by the fire department, only to later rekindle into the Palisades blaze.

This undercuts the knee-jerk “climate emergency” rhetoric from officials and media, shifting the focus squarely to why what started originally as a minor, containable fire wasn’t fully extinguished. 

According to City Journal’s Shawn Regan, “Not only was the Palisades Fire entirely preventable, the evidence suggests; it was also fueled by California state policies that, in the words of one attorney representing fire victims, “put plants over people.”’

Regan and others have documented how California’s Wildfire Management Plan for Topanga State Park prioritized protecting rare plant-life and Native archaeological sites over aggressive firefighting. Though firefighters contained the initial eight-acre fire relatively quickly, they were barred from full mop-up operations – no heavy equipment, no retardant, and as little soil disturbance as possible.

Fire victims’ lawyers unearthed one text message in which an LAFD supervisor was asked whether they should deploy bulldozers to stop the spread of the initial fire. He responded, “Heck no that area is full of endangered plants. I would be a real idiot to ever put a dozer in that area.”

The fire was left to smoulder. Park Rangers and local hikers have testified that they saw smoke and other signs that the fire was not contained, but the site went unmonitored for six days.

In short, DEI and woke hiring practices, along with eco-zealotry and plain old incompetence, managed to turn a minor arson incident into a raging inferno.

This saga should serve as an urgent wake-up call to municipalities everywhere: prioritize raw competence above all else when electing or appointing leaders to positions of public trust. 

When officials chase “woke” ideas – whether it’s diverting resources to DEI programs over disaster preparedness, prioritizing endangered plants over human lives and property, or indulging in climate virtue-signalling instead of maintaining basic infrastructure – they don’t just fail, they actively betray the citizens they are sworn to serve and protect. 

Los Angeles stands as a tragic exhibit of how thoroughly institutions captured by the woke, green left-wing will sacrifice the actual public good in a heartbeat when ideology trumps duty. The results, in this case, are death, destruction, and ruin.

Voters, take note and act: demand competence, accountability, and a relentless focus on the basics over empty ideology, identity politics, or progressive posturing. Hold your leaders to that standard, or the next time a crisis hits, it might be your house that goes up in flames.

Your City, Your Vote: Why 2026 Matters More Than You Think

Your City, Your Vote: Why 2026 Matters More Than You Think

Municipal Watch readers have likely seen the excellent news out of Calgary. In December of 2025, soon after Alberta’s municipal elections, the new Calgary city council made a smart, straightforward decision: no more foreign flags flying at City Hall. In a tight 8-7 vote, city councillors, led by the newly-elected Mayor Jeromy Farkas, decided that only the flags of Canada, Alberta, and Calgary itself would be allowed to fly at Calgary city hall. 

Soon after his election, Mayor Farkas questioned the policy that allowed flags of any federally recognized nation to be raised at city hall. As the Carney Liberal government in Ottawa had only a month earlier recognized Palestine, it was no surprise that requests to fly the Palestinian flag immediately followed. Mayor Farkas argued these flag-raisings, meant to celebrate something called “diversity,” were now just stirring up division, protests, and extra security headaches

Bottom line? Calgary banned the city hall’s involvement with any flags other than the national, provincial and municipal flags. This was a win for common sense. Flags matter. They’re powerful symbols of loyalty and unity, not just decorations. 

Great move, Calgary! 

Here’s hoping more cities across Canada ban foreign flags from public squares.

I mention the situation in Calgary again because it highlights the importance of electing common-sense representatives to the municipal level of government. There was never any chance that a measure this symbolically significant would have ever passed under the council led by former Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek. Thankfully, Calgary voters threw Gondek out in the October 2025 election, elected 10 new councillors to the 14-person city council, replacing the 8 who retired and the two incumbents who were defeated, and resulting in (if the foreign flag vote is an early indication!) a much higher quality bunch of city councillors. 

What about your city or town? Is a refresh needed? New blood? Fresh faces? A bit more common sense? When will be the next opportunity for you to pass judgement – and vote! – on your mayor and councillors?

Millions of Canadians will have their chance to vote in a local election this year, in 2026!

Here are the provinces (and one territory) that will be electing new municipal governments this year, 2026

  • New Brunswick: May 11
  • British Columbia: October 17
  • Ontario: October 26
  • Manitoba: October 28
  • Prince Edward Island: November 2
  • Saskatchewan: November 8/9
  • Northwest Territories: December 14

With respect, I suggest now is the time for sensible people to start giving some thought to our local government. It’s time to ask ourselves the common-sense questions, in particular: after the votes have been counted and the results are in, will my local municipal council have a mayor or, at least, a majority of councillors, with the courage to stand up to the woke, virtue-signalling mob on issues such as banning foreign flags on municipal property?

Yes, I recognize that the foreign flag issue is merely “symbolic” and, yes, there are surely “more important issues” to be discussed. Indeed, if you have been following my blog posts this year, you will have read about some of them: climate alarmism, oil & gas advertising bans, the dangers of Net Zero, electric vehicle mandates, the War on the Car, and other extreme green left environmental policies, for example. 

But, make no mistake, the symbolism of the foreign flag ban is indeed powerful.  Local councillors who aren’t prepared to vote the right way on such a simple issue are very likely going to be “woke” and extremist on a whole host of other issues.

And, so, VOTERS, I implore you to take note and act: demand competence, accountability, and a relentless focus on the basics. Let’s make sure we hold our leaders to that standard on every issue, large and “small.”

We must not waste this huge opportunity! For most Canadians, 2026 represents the most tangible chance to influence politics where it matters most: at the local level.