Mark Carney Net Zero

Mark Carney: Architect of Global Net Zero Scam

Our green globalist Prime Minister Mark Carney holds three passports – that we know of. Appropriate for one of the international architects of the global Net Zero scam, an ideology that is pursued enthusiastically by virtually every municipality in Canada (with encouragement from Trudeau’s and now Carney’s government).

As a reminder, Net Zero means offsetting the amount of carbon dioxide a nation emits through measures such as buying e-credits or removing it from the atmosphere through “carbon capture technology.” However, since carbon credits aren’t real and carbon capture is an expensive boondoggle, in practice, Net Zero demands slashing emissions to near-zero levels through drastic measures: phasing out fossil fuels, substituting costly and unreliable “renewables” like wind and solar, and imposing various types of mandates on consumers. 

(Wonder why there is still no new pipeline approved?)

Net Zero in Europe

Net Zero constitutes a radical restructuring not just of energy systems, but of the global economy.

Net Zero’s pitfalls are evident across Europe, one of Mark Carney’s home bases, where aggressive implementation has triggered an alarming number of energy crises. Germany’s infamous Energiewende (or “energy transition”) policy program is perhaps the most well-known example. The goal of Energiewende was to clamp down on the usage of traditional energy sources – oil, natural gas, even nuclear power – creating artificial energy scarcity, with the expectation that (heavily subsidized) wind and solar would step in and fill the void.

Consequently, the cost of electricity soared, such that Germans now pay the highest prices in the EU. This has contributed to deindustrialization, with major companies like Mercedes-Benz shifting production to Hungary, whose energy rates are 70% lower than Germany’s.

Even with higher rates, wind and solar can’t really power the entire grid of a country of 80 million people, so, in recent years, Germany became increasingly dependent on imported Russian fossil fuels to fill in the gaps. When the War in Ukraine made that untenable, the government decided on a shocking course of action – to resume burning coal just to keep the lights on, while maintaining their fantastical belief that wind and solar are the way of the future.

Germany is far from the only country brought low by Net Zero groupthink. In Great Britain, another of Carney’s countries, where he also served as central banker from 2013 to 2020, Net Zero by 2050 targets were legally mandated by the then-governing Conservative Party in 2019. But the currently governing Labour Party has gone even further, embracing Net Zero with a religious mania.

Chief among the green maniacs is Ed Miliband, Secretary of Energy Security and Net Zero. Miliband has declared that “the transition [to Net Zero] is unstoppable, [though] we need to make it move faster.” He gave himself the task of picking up the national pace, setting a goal of decarbonizing the U.K.’s electrical grid by 95% by the year 2030.

To that end, the government has invested heavily in wind and solar, while banning new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea. They’ve also moved up the timeline for banning new gas-powered cars in the country from 2035 to 2030. In less than four years, British drivers will effectively be forced into electric vehicles – whether they want them or not.

Predictably, British electricity rates are rapidly catching up to Germany’s. With a bit more time, and a bit more of the Labour government’s radical green policies, they will surely have the highest energy rates in the developed world. 

Other British Net Zero insanities include the U.K. Climate Change Committee’s continual over-the-top recommendations to parliament, including that they adopt policies which will reduce meat and dairy consumption by up to 50% by 2050, and reduce air travel, perhaps through a “frequent flyer levy.” No more pleasure travel for the British hoi polloi!

No wonder that Prime Minister Keir Starmer had to admit recently that popular backing for Net Zero had “broken down.”

The UK has become increasingly reliant on electricity imported from other European nations, despite Miliband’s constant claim that Net Zero will make the U.K. energy self-sufficient. But because the Net Zero mind virus is catching, it isn’t a sure thing that electricity will always be there to import. Just last year, Spain and Portugal experienced among the worst blackouts in Europe in decades, with an estimated 60 million people losing power. This occurred just days after Spain had bragged that it had successfully run their grid on 100% “green” energy for a short period of time.

PM Carney was, as noted, the Governor of the Bank of England. He was then and remains a leader in this European Net Zero cult. Let’s admit it, though, we all have friends who say that Mark Carney is “ok” because he is “some sort of conservative.” 

Don’t fall for this nonsense. And take action.

This year, voters in six provinces and one territory in Canada will be electing new politicians at the local level. It’s time to wake up and get involved and elect some municipal leaders who will fight Carney’s Net Zero insanity in our cities and towns, instead of promoting it. 

Carney Net Zero

From Global Ideology to Local Bylaws: Mark Carney and the Spread of Net Zero in Canadian Municipalities

Canadian municipalities have been pushing the radical green Net Zero scam since well before Carney became Prime Minister. I wrote last year about how municipalities push the Net Zero agenda and will expand further in the coming months. But how have more senior levels of government – the ones that plow billions down to the municipal level – been involved in promoting Net Zero ideology? 

Net Zero and the Canadian Governing Class

Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s approach to Net Zero was overt: his first big step, in 2016, was mandating that every province have some sort of carbon tax by 2018. He mandated Net Zero by 2050 into law in 2021, including emissions caps, anti-pipeline legislation like Bill C-69, dubbed the “no more pipelines act,” and Bill C-48, the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act. At one point, even the Conservative Party of Canada’s leader, Erin O’Toole, was duped into promoting the idea of the carbon tax.

Since coming into office, Mark Carney has retained the lion’s share of Trudeau’s Net Zero madness, albeit with a more subtle bait-and-switch approach. The most conspicuous example was the scrapping of the consumer carbon tax while hiking the industrial version, so that consumers pay indirectly, through higher costs.

Carney signed an agreement in November 2025 with Alberta’s Premier Danielle Smith which theoretically offers that province a single new pipeline (which might never get built) and in exchange Alberta had to accept the federal Industrial Carbon Tax, fully commit to Net Zero by 2050, and further agree to spending a ton of money on carbon capture and storage. 

So where is this pipeline? Where is it even being seriously discussed? There’s no project description, no environmental review, and no private-sector partner. It exists only as a bargaining chip – useful for selling a deal, useless for moving a single barrel of oil; in other words, still no pipeline.

Most recently, Carney replaced the federal electric vehicle (EV) mandate, which banned the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, with new tailpipe emissions standards demanding a 75% reduction by 2035 and 90% by 2040. Such stringent cuts constitute an EV mandate in all but name, since only EVs can realistically comply with them.

ONTARIO

Net Zero isn’t only a federal preoccupation. All of the provincial governments are complicit in the Net Zero scam.  And Doug Ford’s Ontario has become the poster child for provincial Net Zero fantasies.

Though Ford came into office in 2018 pledging to fix the energy mess his Liberal predecessors had left him, wind and solar today still – today, in 2026! – comprise a larger share of Ontario’s energy grid than they did eight years ago, his so-called “conservative” government plans to double wind and solar capacity over the next decade. The Ontario government is already spending billions of dollars per year of taxpayer money to subsidize electricity rates, hiding the true cost of electricity from Ontarians while ballooning provincial debt. In a province already grappling with some of North America’s highest power prices, this expansion risks repeating those past Liberal mistakes by prioritizing intermittent renewables over more reliable, affordable, and secure options, ultimately hitting households and businesses hardest. 

MUNICIPAL NET ZERO

Net Zero nonsense has filtered steadily downward not only into provincial policy but, most quietly of all, into municipal “climate emergency” declarations across the country. City councils from coast to coast have embedded Net Zero targets into long-term strategic plans, infrastructure priorities, building codes, and procurement rules, often with little public scrutiny and even less debate about cost. 

These municipal commitments are presented as morally unquestionable and technically inevitable. They are neither. They are expensive policy choices that will shape land use, housing affordability, transportation systems, and local tax burdens for decades. Net Zero’s municipal incarnation risks hardwiring those consequences directly into the daily lives of Canadian families. The cliff edge may be national in rhetoric, but the pain felt as a result will be local.

In the end, Net Zero is nothing less than economic self-sabotage dressed up as virtue. Our weakling and virtue-signalling municipalities have either signed on to this Net Zero with great enthusiasm, in some cases, or have, at the very least, completely caved into the pressure from higher levels of government.  Shame on them.